In recent decades, the electronic games industry has become a widespread phenomenon in all countries, including Islamic countries, from children's games to global competitions. The present study, by analyzing jurisprudential statements and data and using a library method, has tried to explore the legitimacy and jurisprudential foundations of these types of games from the perspective of jurisprudential schools. The results of the study show that due to the unprecedented and new nature of these types of games in Islamic jurisprudence, jurists have mainly considered the rulings and rules governing games in terms of gambling. With this assumption, electronic games are also included in the scope of these games and as a result, they have been considered by jurists. Accordingly, jurists have tried to determine the legality and sanctity of games by citing verses and narrations, by presenting criteria and criteria and the order of effects (benefits and harms). Based on these criteria and criteria, the basic principle of electronic games is permissible, unless it causes corruption and harm, in which case it will be forbidden.