نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشگاه بین المللی اهلبیت ع
2 دانشجوی دکتر حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
There is a lot of disagreement about the legitimacy of the conditional sale in Islamic jurisprudence. Some jurists of Hanafi jurisprudence have annulled the sale mainly by arguing for two reasons. This theory has affect to the annulment of the conditional sale in the civil law of Egypt, Jordan and Syria. Some jurists have also considered it in accordance with the mortgage. Influenced by this view, the Iraqi and Algerian civil law has legislated the conditional sale as a mortgage. The issue of this research is the critique of the arguments of those who believe in the invalidity of the conditional sale and also the critique of the view that it is a mortgage in Hanafi jurisprudence.
This research shows that none of the stated reasons can prove the invalidity of the sale or its mortgage. Therefore, conditional sale is valid. It is included to general evidence of the contracts
کلیدواژهها [English]